The Jungle Essay Evidence #1: The house that Jurgis and his family had bought was non new at alto fussher as they had supposed; it was closely fifteen days old, and there was nothing new upon it merely the paint, which was so crowing that it needed to be put on new each(prenominal) year or two. The house was atomic number 53 of a intact row that was construct by a company which existed to rat money by swindling poor people. Jurgiss family had give fifteen atomic number 6 dollars for it, and it had not greet the builders five hundred when it was new and nanna Majauszkiene knew that, because her son belonged to a political organization with a contractor who put up exactly such houses. They used the rattling flimsiest and cheapest material: They built the houses a dozen at a time, and they c ard intimately nothing at all except the removed shine. (pg.81) commentary #1: The familys encounter with Grandmother Majauszkiene shows that the strong acres companies make trapped them in a scheme by vary them a house that is shinny and pretty on the surface but rotten on the inside. The house is sold on its appearance and not its live able conditions.
The documentary dry land agents con people into buying the homes by telling them they argon going fast to pressure families into buying without considering all the conditions of the house. The real Estate agents also sell the houses as rentals until it is paid for, penetrating that most families will go through a consequence of time where they will struggle, and most likely miss a payment, and if so the family will be evicted from the ho use and lose everything. This all considered! corporate gain at the expense of the consumer. Evidence #2: on that point was no heat upon... If you want to get a rich essay, order it on our website:
OrderCustomPaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment